The Red Cross and the Holocaust: Humanitarian Aid, Complicity, or Ineffectiveness?

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18255223

Authors

  • Uroosa Khan Department of English at the University of South Dakota, USA
  • Faisal Khan National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Khan Sofiya Department of English, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Islamabad, Pakistan

Keywords:

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); Holocaust; the Nazi ghetto of Theresienstadt; humanitarian dilemmas; Gaza and Ukraine

Abstract

This paper reexamines the role of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) during the Holocaust, questioning whether its neutrality rose up to humanitarian failure or complicity. Through a close analysis of the ICRC’s origins, operational limitations, and its controversial visit to the Nazi ghetto of Theresienstadt, the paper explores how logistical barriers, political pressures, and moral ambivalence shaped the organization's passivity and inaction. Drawing on historical records and scholarly critiques, it interrogates the ethical implications of institutional passivity in the face of genocide. The paper concludes by connecting these lessons to modern-day humanitarian dilemmas in conflict zones like Gaza and Ukraine, urging a reconsideration of neutrality as a guiding principle.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Uroosa Khan, Faisal Khan, & Khan Sofiya. (2026). The Red Cross and the Holocaust: Humanitarian Aid, Complicity, or Ineffectiveness? : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18255223. Pakistan Journal of Social Science Review, 5(1), 155–163. Retrieved from https://pjssrjournal.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/471

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.